Dismissal vs Sustainment

WELCOME!

ABOUT THE COMMISSION
- Background
- Goals
- Membership
- Meetings
- Publications
- Links
- FAQ's
- Contact Us
DISCIPLINARY FUNCTION
COMMISSION ACTIVITY
- Docket
  - 2009
  - 2008
  - 2007
  - 2006
  - 2005
  - 2004
  - 2003
  - 2002
  - 2001
  - 2000
- Dispositions
  - Dismissal vs Sustainment
  - Public
- Public Actions
  - Open Complaints
  - 2010
  - 2009
  - 2008
  - 2007
  - 2006
  - 2005
  - Older Public Actions
- Cases Filed with the Supreme Court
GOVERNING PROVISIONS
FILING A COMPLAINT
DISCIPLINE DATABASE

Dismissal vs Sustainment

Home : Commission Activity : Dispositions : Dismissal vs Sustainment

	DISPOSITION	2005	2006	2007	2008	2009

DISMISSAL
	Complaint withdrawn	2		3		1
	Dismissed due to related CJC decision					15
	Insufficient evidence to proceed	16	31	28	20	19
	Lack of jurisdiction	4		5	4	1
	Left office unrelated to CJC action	3		3		1
	Legal issues over which commission has no jurisdiction	127	113	132	106	83
	No basis to reopen	20	24	19	29	35
	No violation found	45	45	44	55	65
	Resigned due to CJC action. Dismissed.	1
	Unsubstantiated	104	133	152	141	134

SUSTAINMENT
	Admonishment	3	9*	3*	2
	Reprimand	8*	2*	1	5*	2*
	Censure	3	1	1	3*	1
	Recommendation of Suspension filed with Supreme Court					5*
	Recommendation of Removal filed with Supreme Court

TOTAL DISPOSITIONS		336	359	391	365	362


*	Complaint disposition does not always reflect Commission action. Due to multiple complaints against the same judicial officer, a single disposition may dispose of several cases. In addition, due to diverse allegations or more than one judge within the same complaint, complaints may be disposed for more than one reason. Refer to the dockets for more information.

* These files were saved in ".pdf" format. Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view them. If you don't have Adobe Acrobat Reader installed, it is available for free from the Adobe web site.

Discipline Database | Contact Us | Privacy Notice Information | Site map